|
.Our client called in September
to find out what type of instrumentation we had,
explains Kim Kirchner, pharmaceutical project leader.
And on a Friday afternoon in early October, we learned
wed be getting 600 samples on Monday. I had pulled
together similar short-notice projects for other clients,
so I was confident our team would rally to this challenge.
The usual daily sample load for the TOC Group is 150.
At times, during this project, 1,200 samples were in the
system.
Any one group could have held up the
processing flow, according to Kirchner. But each group
made the necessary scheduling adjustments. Our client
was pleased with the companys efficiency,
she notes.
Dana Cunningham, senior chemist/group
leader in the Pharmaceutical Water Testing Group, was
responsible for organizing the analytical effort. Her
TOC operation is usually staffed by three analytical team
members, but a cross-trained TOC analyst from the companys
Environmental Division was brought in to help as were
employees from the Pharmaceutical Divisions Raw
Materials Group, swelling the number of team members to
10. In addition, staff members from the sample reporting
operation assisted with retrieving and restocking samples.
When I asked for volunteers, I
was overwhelmed with everyones desire to help,
says Cunningham. Some took on entire shifts while others
volunteered for half shifts in addition to their regular
work. Volun-
teers working round-the-clock filled even the Saturday
and Sunday shifts.
The mammoth effort required continual
flexibility by the combined departmental staff members.
Our people were so understanding of the clients
ever-changing needs. Sometimes the samples we anticipated
did not come in, and wed have to cancel shifts.
But I didnt hear a single complaint during the entire
project. The team members were incredibly cooperative,
says Cunningham. Not a single hour of the work involved
was mandatory. People were that willing to pitch in.
|